Saturday, December 03, 2005

Canadian Blog Awards

There's another election going on - the final five nominees have been announced in all categories for the Canadian Blog Awards. I'm very pleased to see this blog nominated for:

Best Blog
Best Progressive Blog
Best Blog Post Series (for the Greatest Prime Minister series)

I'll take a look at the whole field later this week, but for now I encourage you to go and vote. As for why you should vote for this blog, consider the following:

1. If you google "David Herle", this blog comes up second
2. David Herle is an egomaniac
3. Therefore, David Herle has obviously googled himself and seen this blog
4. I have writen less than flatering things about David Herle
5. Therefore, if this blog won "Best Blog", it would certainly piss off David Herle

If that's not a sales pitch to vote for me, I don't know what is.


  • This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    By Blogger RoninKengo, at 3:34 a.m.  

  • Didn't know they had Liberals in Alberta.

    Accordion Guy is some stiff competition for Best Blog.

    By Blogger RoninKengo, at 3:35 a.m.  

  • Your logic is flawless! You've got at least one of my votes...

    By Blogger Ryan Ringer, at 4:21 a.m.  

  • Aw hell, make it all three.

    By Blogger Ryan Ringer, at 4:24 a.m.  

  • All Liberals and the corrupt liberal media are running scared...

    First come the audits...
    Then come the accountability in News Reporting Laws...
    Then come the criminal charges...

    Hey all you Commie/Socialist Lying Liberal thieves at the Star, Globe and Mail, CTV,(CBC Pravda)..etc..

    Your days are numbered ..
    It's 52 I think....!!!!!!!!

    Long live truth, justice and the Stephen Harper way....

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 11:44 a.m.  

  • canadian blog awars, brought to you by famous anti-semite and foul mouthed troll Robert McLelland of My Blahg fame.

    Anyone that writes F^&% the Jews on a wall is beneath contempt, and anyone that gets involved with him only dirties themselves. Don't play with anti-semites, as that shit tends to stick.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 1:12 p.m.  

  • Except that Robert never did that. He was only describing a hypothetical situation to (ineptly) make a point that criticism of Israel's security policies does not automatically equate to anti-semitism, even though too many people attack such criticism as such.

    By Blogger James Bow, at 2:49 p.m.  

  • Yeah, Robert's quotes were definitely taken out of context. It wasn't a very smart way to go about making a point and he probably should have apologized, but I really don't think he's anti-semetic.

    By Blogger calgarygrit, at 4:03 p.m.  

Post a Comment

<< Home