Jack Layton: Making Parliament Work Since One Week Ago
Labels: Jack Layton
Labels: Jack Layton
posted by calgarygrit at 6:47 p.m.
Canadian Politics, Canadian Politics and more Canadian Politics. From the mind of a Calgary Liberal, now living in the centre of the universe.
Online Poker in Canada
Calgary Musicals
Blog Roll
A BCer in Toronto
Adam Radwanski
Big City Liberal
Calgary Liberal
Coyne
Daveberta
Delacourt
Far and Wide
538
Impolitical
James Bow
Kady O'Malley
Pundit's Guide
Scott's DiaTribes
Silver Powers
Stephen Taylor
Warren
Wells
Liblogs
Progressive Bloggers
Blogging Dippers
Blogging Tories
News
Bourque
Calgary Herald Blogs
CBC
CTV
Full Pundit
Globe & Mail
The Hill Times
Canada.com
National Newswatch
Best of CalgaryGrit
ELXN41
Election '09 '08
(41% of) Alberta Votes 2008: The Ed Files Election
The Race for Stornoway (2006)
(65% of) Canada Votes 2006
2011
In support of a primary system
The Fall and Rise of Dalton McGuinty
ALP leadership candidate profiles
LPC leadership race expectations
Election Postmortems: Greens, Bloc, NDP, Lib, CPC
Alberta Politics FAQ
Swann Song
2010
Lessons from Nenshi Victory
What's the matter with Calgary?
Calgary mayoral candidate profiles
Tony Clement bungles the Census
Everything you wanted to know about the Census
In favour a Liberal-CPC merger
Against a Liberal-NDP merger
Moment of the Decade
2009
Christmas Letters: May, Layton, Ignatieff, Harper
Advice for Ignatieff
Wild Rose Leadership Race
Alberta Politics Gets Interesting
MP Interviews
Michael Ignatieff profile
One Member One Vote
2008
Alberta Liberal Leadership Race
The Race Victory March for Stornoway Sussex Stornoway
Political Insanity
Duelling Pro-Democracy Rallies
Coalition
Campaigning in New Hampshire
Rebuilding the Big Red Machine
Obama Endorsement
CG on Test the Nation
2007
2007 Year in Review Quiz
The Saga of Paul Jackson
The Saga of Craig Chandler
Dion's First Year
David Karwacki Interview
Peace in Our Time
Quebec Debat Live Blog
Green Questions Series
Harper's First Year
2006
2006 Year in Review Quiz
Dion Wins
CG Unmasked
Results for People
Gerard Kennedy Endorsement
Rebuilding the Liberals
Draft Paul Hellyer
2005 Year in Rerview
2005
In Defense of the NEP
Harper's Errors in Logic
State of the Disunion Address
LPCA Convention, featuring Jean Lapierre
2004
2004 Recap
Gay Marriage
Gun Registry
Paul Martin's First Year
Provincial Debate Recap
French Debate Recap
Ill-Fated Atttempts at Humour
Tim Hudak's math problem
Tim Hortons versus the UN
Exclusive: Roll Up The Attack Ads
How the Grinch Prorogued Parliament
You too, can be an anonymous Liberal
A Letter from the Nigerian Prince
Stelmach Fixed Election Dates
Black versus Female Presidents
Resistance is Futile
Where Jim Dinning Stands
Fantasy Leadership
Memories
Assymetrical Advertising
Belinda's Love Life
The Race To Decentralize
Why Did The Chicken Cross The Road?
Stampede Fashion Roundup
2005,
2006,
2007,
2008,
2009,
2010,
2011
Person of the Year
2010,
2009,
2008,
2007,
2006,
2005,
2004
Contests
Moment of the Decade
Canada's Silliest Scandal
Canada's Biggest Election
Canada's Best Premier
Greatest Prime Minister...We Never Had
The Greatest Prime Minister
CalgaryGrit Hall of Fame
Jean Lapierre
Ralph Klein
Better Know a Riding
Saanich Gulf Islands
Papineau
Central Nova
Bart's Books
Deadly Fall
Chretien Memoirs
Mulroney's Memoirs
Rick Mercer Report
French Kiss
Black Swan
The Way it Works
Democracy Derailed
Right Side Up
Fun with Numbers
2011 Election by numbers
2011 Election Seat Projections
Seat Projections
2008 Conservative Vote
2008 Liberal Vote
Liberal-NDP merger (2011 update)
The Impact of By Elections
2008 CPC Breakthroughs
2008 Liberal Breakthroughs
National Battleground?
Incumbency Effects
2006 Liberal Leadership Projections
Perils of Strategic Voting
26 Comments:
I swear I almost saw a smirk near the end there.
By Kyle H, at 6:51 p.m.
CTV showed it.
By A Eliz., at 7:17 p.m.
How laughably bad.
By Anonymous, at 7:20 p.m.
At least he's not lost in the woods.
By Ian, at 7:23 p.m.
The funny thing is that I bet you lots of people watching that think by "On Your Side" he is speaking to them and not just the Conservatives.
Not a particularly well thought out slogan.
By Thomas, at 7:33 p.m.
I got my NDP 10 per center today. Bit out of date. It says, prominently:
"Your Liberal MP is propping up Stephen Harper. Is that what you voted for?"
As if Jack isn't spinning just as much as the other guys.
By Anonymous, at 7:50 p.m.
Anon, that's those clever socialists at work! Not content with sending out one message to convince swing voters, they're sending out two! If the new one isn't enough reasons to vote for them, the old one may be enough to collect votes from aimless disaffected Liberals.
I feel bad for you lefty swing voters. Lost between some Narnia wilderness and a vacuous orange realm.
Don't you see? You should vote Harper! This is all because of his masterful manipulations! He is truly a superior entity, entitled to be PM for life.
You know it.
By Johnny Banananuck, at 7:58 p.m.
Your party voted for Harper 79 times! 79 times, the Liberal Party of Canada let Harper have his way. Now ... why was that? Why did the party you support vote for a bunch of 'Bush loving' Right wingers - vote after vote after vote?
I'll tell you why. Because all that 'Iggy' offers the Canadian people is more of the same ... merely a watered down version of what Harper has been flogging.
Get a real party ... A lot of Canadians are wondering why the Liberal Party bothers to exist? Enough with the games.
By leftdog, at 9:20 p.m.
come on jack, stop. really. spare me. What a waste of your supporter's money. Comartin, please stage a coup willya?
By Scott in Montreal, at 10:43 p.m.
Actually some of us would like to see Justin Trudeau stage a coup on Iggy ... especially now that he has spilled the beans to the press that Ignatieff, in reality, DOES NOT WANT AND ELECTION!
By leftdog, at 11:29 p.m.
'It's Prime Minister Stephen Harper who wants an election, and not his party leader, Michael Ignatieff' says Liberal MP, Justin Trudeau.
Oh, but Libs are tabling a non-confidence motion, tomorrow, and they don't want an election?
'I thought Harper's time was up'.
Canadians are not stupid!
By wilson, at 11:42 p.m.
leftdog, just look at who Bob Layton was. Jack is his daddy's boy. Always was and always will be. Mulroney loyalist.
By Scott in Montreal, at 12:13 a.m.
That's pretty lame Scot in Montreal! I guess now that Libs are bankrupt of any substantive retorts, they are going to resort to nonsense!
The facts stand!
By leftdog, at 12:22 a.m.
This comment has been removed by the author.
By Scott in Montreal, at 12:29 a.m.
@ leftdog: dude, i am Green.
i have interviewed both Jack and his dad. Jack was the perfect NDP leader for Martin govt. but that was yesterday. you would do well to distance yourself from this train wreck. Really.
By Scott in Montreal, at 12:31 a.m.
Oh puleeeesze! You sound like another Green who dabbles Lib as well. And talk about a 'train wreck'... her name is Elizabeth May.
By leftdog, at 12:41 a.m.
"...the Liberal Party of Canada let Harper have his way. Now ... why was that?"
First of all, they did not vote for the CPC bills, however they did allow them to pass.
Second I am surprised you have to ask this question. Are you going to pretend the LPC was ready for an election? Because if you are I have to tell you they were broke and had no organization. Maybe you missed this, but that is precisely why Harper and his pal Layton put all that pressure on the LPC, because they knew the LPC could not vote against the government as they could not have an election.
Now that is Layton's position.
Perhaps you would do better to forgo all those illusions of principled action by all parties.
By Gayle, at 12:49 a.m.
Simon, speaking of Mulroney loyalists, didn't your current leader used to work for the gentleman's government? At least Layton has one degree of separation.
By Greg, at 6:43 a.m.
I don't understand the logic of two coalition partners bashing each other in public.
Reminds me of Denis Coderre affair.
The NDP and Libs need to make up and play nice in the public sphere.
The regular votes is watching the smaller parties take turns having confidence in the government.
Instead of spending the next few weeks blaming each other, why not restart the coalition talks with the Bloc and stop playing posturing games in public?
By CanadianSense, at 7:19 a.m.
LOL - this voted 79 times (I guess they have enough finger and toes amongst them to count it) - is stale and stupid.
You see, Layton voted 79 times against Harper (making parliament work afterll) and now suddenly, lighting, thunder - he has confidence in Harper.
Notice - Layton and that blue shirt again and again and again. Oddly enough, Baird keeps wearing an orange tie.
LOL - hypocracy of what.
Lyn
By Anonymous, at 7:56 a.m.
Isn't that cute. CS is STILL trying to flog the coalition meme.
It's over. Deal with it.
I heard Bob Fife saying the conservatives have been directed to attack the NDP in the House because they know that will help Layton hang on to his base. The conservatives want to prop up the NDP because they take votes from the LPC.
Looks like the only two parties working together right now are the wingnuts and the socialists.
By Gayle, at 10:43 a.m.
It's ALL games.
By everyone.
In EVERY party.
If it weren't, then in 79 votes there would be maybe 25 with the government, 54 against, or 34-45 ... or something. Not 0-79 and not 79-0.
By Robert Vollman, at 10:45 a.m.
Looks like the only two parties working together right now are the wingnuts and the socialists.
Just so you know ... if you think a party that received almost 40% of the vote is that far away from you on the political spectrum, then YOU, by definition, are the one on a fringe and therefore a wingnut. By definition.
To be clear, I'm not calling you a wingnut. Your characterisation of a party with almost 40% popular support as being on "a wing" is basically saying that you're on the other, and much further down the extreme of it, too.
By Robert Vollman, at 10:49 a.m.
Yeah, the bottom line is that the NDP and Liberals have both done 180s.
But Jack made such a stink about the Liberals supporting Harper for 79 votes (see comments above), that it's a little rich for him to claim he has altruistic motives for now doing the same thing he bashed them on before.
By calgarygrit, at 11:49 a.m.
"Just so you know ... if you think a party that received almost 40% of the vote is that far away from you on the political spectrum, then YOU, by definition, are the one on a fringe and therefore a wingnut. By definition."
It is a joke. Relax.
Just following in Harper's esteemed footsteps - everyone who is not with me must be labelled and demonized.
I also do not think the NDP are socialists, but that characterization did not seem to bother you.
By Gayle, at 4:15 p.m.
"Don't you see? You should vote Harper! This is all because of his masterful manipulations! He is truly a superior entity, entitled to be PM for life."
I agree! Elections are unnecessary and wasteful. Let's do away with them completely and lower the GST another 2 points. Hurray!
By rerererere, at 7:35 p.m.
Post a Comment
<< Home