Wednesday, March 09, 2011

Demand Better


  • Brilliant!

    You could run a whole campaign on Harper's own words, especially on accountability. In fact, you could just run their 2006 ads.

    By Blogger Ted Betts, at 4:39 p.m.  

  • Actually, re-running an incumbent party's ads in a subsequent election is really, really funny TB!!!

    By Blogger Jacques Beau Vert, at 5:01 p.m.  

  • Dan,

    Did you do that? It's brillent, seriously that's almost as good as a perp walk as far as visuel demonstations go.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:14 p.m.  

  • Anon - I can't take credit for this one.

    I agree though - it's fantastic. Maybe a little too confusing for TV, but as a viral ad, it's delicious.

    By Blogger calgarygrit, at 5:18 p.m.  

  • This is better than anything the Liberals or NDP have put on TV in the past 3 years. They should run it.

    By Anonymous CJS, at 5:51 p.m.  

  • Jacques: How about this one -

    I would pay someone to literally just broadcast that one as it is. With only, maybe, a "That is still true today" or something at the end.

    By Blogger Ted Betts, at 6:03 p.m.  

  • Ads like this just make me want to stay home.

    Seriously - the only two possible governments are arrogant and corrupt.

    The NDP? Powerless at best, props it up at worst.

    This should be an ad for Bloc Quebecois.

    By Blogger Robert Vollman, at 6:18 p.m.  

  • The problem with this as a TV ad is you have to be watching it. If you just hear this ad as background noise while doing something else, it reinforces the idea that Harper is a good guy (for those who haven't been paying attention to what their fearless leader has been doing.)

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:52 p.m.  

  • Seriously - the only two possible governments are arrogant and corrupt.

    Yes... I have nothing to add beyond my agreement

    By Blogger Jacques Beau Vert, at 3:03 p.m.  

  • Last night (Wed) that video had 301 hits on Youtube. Today, 4000+. Perhaps there is some traction with this narrative?

    By Blogger R, at 5:02 p.m.  

Post a Comment

<< Home