Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Don't Mind Me, I'm Just the PM

Damn that Paul Wells and his quick posting - I was all set to go off on the ridiculous comments by Paul Martin in today's Globe & Mail when I see he beat me to the punch. The story reads like something out of the Onion:

New Delhi — Prime Minister Paul Martin said Tuesday that he did not accept the resignation of Judy Sgro's chief of staff two months ago because it was up to the chief of staff to make his own decision on whether to stay.

The Globe and Mail reported on Monday that members of Mr. Martin's office counseled chief of staff Ihor Wons to stay on the job, despite the fact that he had admitted to creating "an appearance of impropriety" after visiting a strip club to discuss the club owner's plan to bring to Canada 18 strippers. Mr. Martin did not deny that his office may have advised Mr. Wons to stay.

"They seek advice," Mr. Martin said Tuesday. "But the fact is that people are free to make their own decisions, and that's obviously the case for anyone."

This begs a few questions:

1. Can anyone resign? I mean, Martin's logic sets up a paradox where they can't even tender their own resignation since he's decided that it's up to them, but won't allow them to resign, because it's up to them.

2. Why did he allow Judy Sgro to resign? Isn't it her decision too?

3. Will we ever see a staffer resign during the Martin years/months is power? If so, how will that situation differ from this one?

4. Is this all the PMO is now? An advice machine? People have accused the PMO of controlling all aspects of government in the past and now we're supposed to believe it's been run over by Anne Landers?

5. Does Martin expect people to believe that he has no say in what his Cabinet members do and will never interfere in their decisions?

6. What idiot in the PMO wrote up Martin's statement on this? And if the idiot who did ever wants to resign, would he or she be allowed to?


  • Excellent points.. but I dont see how this posting which more or less mocks Martin's stand on this issue is any different from the (now-deleted) posting mocking the Calgary bishop's stand on gays..

    Not trying to stir up trouble.. I just dont see how 1 is any different from the other.. other then you're parodying 1 post and using a traditional critique to bash the other.

    By Blogger Oxford County Liberals, at 6:19 p.m.  

  • The difference is that the other post was defamatory and this one is based on fact. No where in this post does CG say anythign derogatory about Martin, only about the annonymous idiot that wrote up his statement in the paper, which I got to admit was pretty bad (even for the communications department of the OLO, oops, minority PMO)

    Furthermore you could state that
    1) Martin is a pathetic failure visa-a-visa Jean Chretien
    2) Martin has no idea what leadership entails
    3) Martin is unable to create a quality cabinet because he drove most of the quality members of the Liberal Party out of the party
    4) Martin is getting fat
    5) Martin is driving interest in the Liberal Party to JNT levels
    6) And finally, does it matter if political staff in Ottawa are fired, quit or resign, they are all just trying to make their 6 months so that they can get their six months severance when Martin loses the next election

    These could all be interpretted as true statements

    By Blogger iloveLaP, at 3:32 a.m.  

  • Explain to us ignorant masses how the other statement was defamatory.. it just took a look at another statement in the Bible and used the Bishop's statement as an example of how some people can totally warp things out of that Good Book.

    If our host here had written a statement criticizng the Bishop,.. and then gave the example that he did in traditional writing style to hilight how ridiculous it is.. I fail to see how it defames him... yet it was written in parody style.. and that makes a difference?

    Rick Mercer.. watch out

    By Blogger Oxford County Liberals, at 6:08 a.m.  

  • What are your 50,000 thoughts a day creating?

    Our thoughts create our reality. This is a simple truth known by all people involved on the spiritual path. It is one of the most taught universal principles in the personal development field. Yet it is one of the most misunderstood!

    People practice visualisation, affirmations, they use hypnosis, subliminal programming or countless other tools to transform their lives. However they fail to recognise one key area in their lives that hinder these wonderful techniques from being effective.

    They sit day after day visualising their perfect scene and yet nothing happens. Why? They have followed all the instructions to the letter! They have chanted and imagined! They have formed a colourful, vibrant scene in their minds and affirmed that this is their reality. Then all of a sudden things get worse! What is going on?

    Would you like to know the secret? Would you like to know why these people get no results? Would you like to hear one powerful statement that explains everything?

    Good. I will tell you why these people get no results or even opposite results to those they are aiming for -simply because of the following truth. Consciously controlled thoughts such as visualisations do not materialise - ALL thoughts materialise!!!
    Most people believe that if they visualise for 10 minutes a day their lives will magically transform. This is not the case. You must change your core thinking. You think approx. 50,000 thoughts a day. How many of those thoughts are working against your ten minute visualisation?
    You can control the thoughts that enter your mind by changing the way you view the world. You can decide which thoughts you give energy to and which thoughts you discard.

    The thoughts that you follow and give energy to become more dominant than the thoughts you discard. Your subconscious mind records these as your dominant picture on the issue at hand. You then move towards this picture because your subconscious mind starts making your outside world reflect the picture that you have stored internally.
    Your mind should be on whatever you want. The picture you need to have is a positive vision of you already having achieved your goal. To realise this vision you need to focus and concentrate. Remember thoughts are real, they create your reality.
    Let's say you have been visualising a new house. You spend your ten minutes in meditation picturing yourself living in your dream home. You finish your session and get up feeling positive that you will achieve your goal. Then during the day you get a heating bill through the post and exclaim "Oh no look how expensive this is I cannot afford to heat this house". Where is your focus in the present moment? What are you affirming? You are telling your subconscious mind that you cannot deal with what you have. You are affirming that your life is not how you want it to be. If you knew without doubt that within a week you would be moving to your new home would you honestly be worried about a heating bill? Perhaps other doubts creep in like "I should be happy with what I have", or "I will never get this house looking the way I want it" and so on and so on.
    These thoughts that are not aligned with your goal. You are not giving complete attention to what you want. Whilst you are dealing with these other lines of thought your attention is not on your goal.
    If you are aware of your thoughts you will suddenly realise that you have spent much more energy on counter productive thoughts than on creating a dominant picture of the goal you want.
    Point your focus in the direction of you're the life you want. Think about what you want NOT what you don't want. It's that simple.

    Your focus determines your reality. Change your focus and you change your life. personal development plan

    By Blogger cylon, at 2:45 p.m.  

  • By Blogger mmjiaxin, at 8:49 p.m.  

Post a Comment

<< Home