Monday, October 25, 2010

Ontario Votes Live Blog

11:15 pm: Sorry for the delay in status updates. Us elitists can get sidetracked from important tasks like blogging, when filled with rage (and fine wine).

As for the results...well, Ford ran a good campaign. I'll have more on that tomorrow. For now, I think it's important for progressive Torontonians to keep things in perspective. There's only so much the mayor can do - he won't be ripping up the streetcar tracks any time soon, or cancelling the Toronto marathon.

Plus, this is good news for McGuinty - it gets the "angry protest vote" out of everyone's system and gives McGuinty a possible stalking horse to run against in a year's time. This wasn't a conservative wave sweeping across Ontario - many progressive candidates, including Maurizio Bevilacqua and Jim Watson, won tonight.

While the results aren't shocking - I'd predicted a Ford win - it does leave me a big bafflegabed. I mean, I leave Calgary and now they've got Naheed Nenshi and I'm stuck with Rob Ford. I feel a bit like Eeyore with the conservative rain cloud following me around.


8:10 pm: Ford wins. Well, that was anticlimatic.


8:06 pm: The downside of the scan-trons is that you get results right away. With a third of the polls in, Ford has built up a massive 51% to 31% lead.


7:30 pm: My fellow Toronto elitists have begun arriving...we've already had to open up a second bike rack for overflow parking. The wine is chilling, the hors d'oeuvres are cooking, and the recycling boxes have been placed out for everyone. The fun is about to begin!


7:08 pm: Fun drinking game for tonight. Drink a shot of gravy every time someone talks about "the gravy train". See if you can avoid passing out before they declare a winner.


6:35 pm: My prediction for tonight - Ford 45%, Smitherman 41%, Pantalone 12%. But I'm hoping to be proven wrong.


6:25 pm: Just got back from voting for George Smitherman.

The exciting revelation of the day is that Toronto will be using scan-trons for this election - which means Canadian democracy has finally caught up technologically with most 1994 Grade 6 classrooms. Presumably, this should make for a quick reading of the ballots tonight.

Given how close the polls are, this election is going to be all about turnout. So your litmus test tonight is really this - are the lines longer in Etobicoke or in downtown Toronto? The answer to that question will decide the election. For what it's worth, the lineup at my polling station (downtown) seemed about as long as for the federal election.

I'll be hosting a "Toronto elitists" election night party tonight and will be live blogging all the festivities and snark, so be sure to tune back in here later.

Labels: , ,

19 Comments:

  • wish i could be there, but had other non election plans already.

    but i am expecting you to make the call first on the TO mayoral race.

    By Blogger icky, at 7:34 p.m.  

  • If Torontonians are elitists, why did this city keep pushing extra money to Alberta for decades?

    I remember the E C Manning and Aberhart complaints that Alberta wasn't getting enough money--even before equalization!

    Alberta has the same sense of "outsider-ness" as the suburbs do in this Toronto election.

    What may happen to TO tonight is the same thing that's been going on in Alberta for decades.

    Fortunately, I believe Toronto is smarter than the present situation and will pull back from the brink and not allow for the kingship a la Ralph Klein.

    Time will tell. We're better than this and we're not elitists.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 7:49 p.m.  

  • I was trying to get a live feed of election coverage online and read that CP24 declared Ford had won before I could find something. As I don't live in TO, I can laugh about this. The drama queens will be lining up to jump off of the CN tower.

    By Blogger nuna d. above, at 8:17 p.m.  

  • Actually people jump off the Bloor Viaduct, or well they used too before they put up barriers (a bit of local info). I'm from Toronto, now living in Ottawa, I called my mother in TO at about 8:30 and told her I was really sorry, and that I wont be moving back anytime soon.

    By Blogger Alex Curren, at 9:27 p.m.  

  • Earlier in the evening it seemed like Ford had an easy >50%, but now it seems the Pantalone + Smitherman total would be greater. It'll be interesting to see what the final sums are.

    By Blogger Unknown, at 9:37 p.m.  

  • Denied access to my Medical Records by Federal Government

    Confidential Lawyer / Judge ???

    Research / Funding Scandal

    Privacy Commissioner of Canada / Jennifer Stoddart

    Google

    Medicine Gone Bad

    or

    http://medicine-gone-bad.blogspot.com/

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:56 p.m.  

  • Calgary's got to be looking better and better, Dan.

    By Blogger Don, at 10:18 p.m.  

  • I'm Baaaa-aaack!

    By Anonymous Common Sense Revolution, at 10:37 p.m.  

  • You can repost the map on my blog if you wish!

    By Blogger Unknown, at 11:18 p.m.  

  • I'll add, you can't blame Joey Pants for this one. Even if the Smitherman + Pantalone vote barely exceeds the Ford total, it's only by a handful of votes. This was a resounding victory.

    By Blogger calgarygrit, at 11:27 p.m.  

  • You're f****ing hilarious.

    At least you're honest: we respect you for that. But for crying out loud: if you're going to write a purely biased analysis, declare that that's your goal.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:33 a.m.  

  • There's the perception that
    Progressive = Good
    Conservative = Bad

    But that's not always true. Sometimes the progressive candidate is worse - it depends on the individual.

    I'm not saying that's the case here, or in Calgary, I'm just saying that you have to think instead of automatically cheering for the progressive (or conservative) candidate every time.

    By Blogger Robert Vollman, at 11:49 a.m.  

  • And case in point - if you vote for a bad progressive candidate, then voters swing conservative, and vice versa.

    If Ford is as bad as you say, then his term ought to be followed by a huge and entrenched swing back to progressive.

    By Blogger Robert Vollman, at 11:51 a.m.  

  • @Robert Vollman

    What you say about swings is very true. Remember the 1993 federal election when the Conservatives were reduced to 2 seats? Do you remember the Frank McKenna all-Liberal victory in New Brunswick?

    We tend to vote OUT governments rather than vote IN.

    That happened after the 6 years of Mel Lastman as mayor of the megacity.

    I don't believe that Ford has learned the paradox oof leadership:
    the greatest leader must be the most humble of servants. Ford knows how to run a print shop and tell people what to do; that's not possible with a council.

    He's has to learn quickly or be humbled by the fourth estate.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 5:34 p.m.  

  • Uncover elsewhere how that accomplish a invert cell phone search or else a telephone search or else even a telephone number reverse phone lookup search with the intention of locate out who is behind with the purpose of one to has been calling you this entire moment in time ok.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:37 p.m.  

  • I enjoy this nice invalidate telephone lookup otherwise cellular phone search or phone number lookup spot. I can discover much of reverse phone lookup things in relation to invert cellular phone search here in the present day as soon as I check elsewhere this guide here.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:45 p.m.  

  • I enjoy this nice turn around phone search before phone lookup before cell phone number lookup spot. I know how to ascertain much of cell phone lookup things as regards undo cellular phone lookup here today when I checkered not in this guide here.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 9:45 p.m.  

  • I really like this post a terrific deal along with in fact I would as well like to facilitate see rider you have selected sort of facebook page to facilitate reverse cell phone lookup power be present able to facilitate do a rearrange telephone lookup concerning so so once to we know how to unearth not in who the web site owner is and qualification that doesn't work, maybe using a phone search that tell what kind of twitter tale they strength be the owner of in view of the fact that well power be present a serious idea. As well as last condition not least know how to continually attempt out the cellular phone number search types of computer software obtainable so to we know how to uncover not in each kinds of matter down folks weird numbers in our day quickly along with easily or its also late.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 6:54 a.m.  

  • By Blogger raybanoutlet001, at 11:38 p.m.  

Post a Comment

<< Home