Thursday, February 24, 2005

20 Questions

First of all, I think we made the right call on Star Wars, for the reasons previously discussed. But the PM’s handling of this has been a little awkward, to put it mildly. Now that we finally know Canada won’t be a part of missile defense, a few questions need answering. The first three are either asked or hinted at by Paul Wells.


20 Questions for Paul Martin

1. Did you try to telephone George W. Bush with the news?
2. Is the president taking your calls?
3. Was this handled better than Chretien’s decision to not send troops to Iraq which your advisors heavily criticized? If so, how?
4. As Stephen Harper asked in question period today, what exactly are we saying no to?
5. Can you specify what aspect of BMD led you to reject it?
6. Were there any conditions under which you would have joined BMD?
7. Paul Cellucci says that Canada has given up its “sovereignty” and will no longer have a say on missiles coming towards Canada. Is this true?
8. When did the government arrive at this decision?
9. Earlier this week, government MPs said the House would be informed when a decision was made. However, Codi Rice and Cellucci were called two days ago with our decision. Phrasing this in the form of a question: What the hell?
10. I hate to use the f-word, but you’ve previously been very much in favour of BMD. I know on same sex marriage you were previously “divided” but on this one you were squarely in favour. Is this a flip-flop? If so, please explain the reasons for flip-floping.
11. Bill Graham, the Minister of Defense, has said there would be grave consequences if Canada didn't join missile defense. Do you still feel these consequences will happen and, if so, what will they entail?
12. Has Bill Graham changed his position on missile defense too?
13. Did Frank McKenna’s announcement on Tuesday that we’ve joined BMD have anything to do with the timing of the announcement?
14. Speaking of which, now that we’ve said “no”, what did Frank McKenna mean?
15. Why didn’t you wait a week to see what the Liberal Party’s grass-roots had to say about the issue at their policy convention next week?
16. In the throne speech amendment, you agreed to hold a vote on missile defense. Why isn’t this vote being held?
17. How did you let Jack Layton lead the national debate on this issue?
18. I take it George Bush likely won’t be cheering on the L-20 idea, right?
19. It’s worth asking again: What exactly did we say “no” to?
20. Mr. Martin, how did you solve the Mexican peso crisis? (courtesy of Neil Finkelstein)

42 Comments:

  • I'm not sure that your question 10 is a fair one. Suggesting that politicians shouldn't change their minds is asking them to be either omniscient or unquestioningly dogmatic regarding their positions. Now the first option is impossible and I think the second is distasteful. I prefer a "flip-flopper" over someone who adheres to a stance despite good reason to give it up. Also considering that the majority of Canadians (or so it seems from various informal polls I've seen in places like the Globe and Mail) doesn't support the idea that Canada should get involved in star wars, I think that Martin changing is position is the right thing to do as our representative. That said, I think Martin is a jerk for other reasons.

    -Socialist Swine

    By Blogger Socialist Swine, at 5:34 PM  

  • Cal Grit:

    Regarding Celluci's claim that Canada had given up its soveriegnty now that we were out of the loop on the plan.. thats a disingenuous statement. One of Joe Clarks former policy advisers (I forget her name at the moment) wrote in a Feb 9 Op-ed in the Toronto Star that leaked parts of the US-UK agreement on BMD showed that the UK would get no say on when US interceptors were launched from their soil to intercept a missile threat.

    So.. Britain.. led by the closest ally of the US right now.. Tony Blair, couldnt get a say in this.. and appears to have lost soveriegnty in signing this agreement..... so what makes anyone here think Canada would have done better or that we're worse off by not agreeing to this?

    By Blogger Scott Tribe, at 6:43 PM  

  • Britain's contribution to the Iraq war doesn't seem to have bought Blair much influence either.

    Bush's formula seems to be:

    If yer with me, I maybe won't piss on your lawn... otherwise, I'll be dumping a pile in yer living room.

    By Blogger Mark Francis, at 7:18 PM  

  • 1. CG: excellent excellent post. Keep up the good work.

    2. CPSS re. q. 10: CG asked for an explanation in lieu of a denunciation. Martin may well be right for changing his position (though I don't think so personally), but *even if* he is right his execution of that decision is horrible. crap. Canadians deserve better. Either the issue is as important as he said it was, or it isn't. If it isn't, say why. If it is, do the things alluded to in CG's list.

    3. Scott re. Blair: I think we can assume a quid pro quo whereby if the US has the luxury of enough time to dial up Tony before the missle hits or is out of range, they will. But I don't think that assumption of an adequate window can be presumed so as to be read into policy or an operating procedure.

    By Blogger matt, at 10:39 PM  

  • Matt: the agreement would have mentioned that... Joe Clark's former adviser did not indicate that it said that (just so you know.. she opposed Canada joining the BMD.. and I believe Mr Clark did as well.. proving not all Tories are loony)

    By the way Matt.. is the user commentary from Canadians at this particular American consevative site representative about how conservative Canadians view their country?

    http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/archives/003900.php

    By Blogger Scott Tribe, at 10:47 PM  

  • Question 7 isn’t really fair. Paul Celluci says a lot of thing, most of them stupid. Accusing us of sacrificing our sovereignty is even more shrill than Celluci usually sounds. No Canadian Prime Minister should be expected to suffer the indignity of being enticed into a public debate with that pompous arse.

    By Blogger Psychols, at 11:12 PM  

  • matt,

    You have a point, an explanation for the change of heart would be nice. However, the answer seems pretty clear, the majority of Canadians don't like the idea of Star Wars. Also the Liberals need to keep themselves distinct from the CPC and BMD is one of the areas that isn't particularly consequential where they can do that. Also imagine the stink that would be raised by Layton and Duceppe if Martin didn't say no to Star Wars. Though perhaps he should have had an open vote on it. However, isn't defense decisions under the jurisdiction of the PMO? I'm not entirely sure, I must admit sometimes I'm mystified by some of the nuances of the bureaucracy of Ottawa.

    By Blogger Socialist Swine, at 11:32 PM  

  • Um, I really do not know what to say CG, you dumbfound me again with your ignorance of PM's leadership style. Let me go through some or all of your points

    1) No, he needed to consult cabinet first on when the right time would be to contact W, then Herle had to commission a poll to confirm.
    2)Yes, he loves Paul and his new 13 Billion for defence, soften up the Pres a bit
    3) Everything Paul does is better than Chretien, the Canadian public just has not realized this yet
    4) We are saying no to saying yes
    5) PM rejects the premise of that question
    6) If the PM could ever win a majority government
    7) Cellucci should be on the Saprano's
    8) Five minutes after Herle did the uptenth poll
    9) What the hell is Parliament, next thing you know you will be saying there is a democratic deficit
    10) One flip-flop and now that is what Paul is being called, name one other time Paul martin has flip-flopped
    11) The sky will fall (even before it was going to anyway because of same-sex marriage), and the Liberal convention will be even more boring
    12) BG switches sides all the time
    13) No, Paul makes his own independent decisions
    14) It was the start of Frank's glorious run to the Liberal leadership
    15) Because Paul does not believe in policy from the grassroots
    16) Democratic deficit?? DO NOT START THAT AGAIN
    17) Jack is a leader, a charismatic ladies man, and Paul is old and can not lead all the time
    18) No
    19) We said no to saying yes
    20) Paul is omnipresent, he knows all, sees all, and solves all. You should be aware CG that he is NOT happy with you. So you better smartin up.

    By Blogger iloveLaP, at 1:31 AM  

  • Hey, CG:

    The ones I have answers for:
    9. It's bad enough to say no. You don't additionally SURPRISE them by saying no. When the official announcement was made, it was made in the house. That was going to prompt questions to the US, and the US deserved a couple of days to get the answers ready.
    15. There was no real question of where the party stood, and the PM is still more acountable to voters than he is to the party.
    16. The House of Commons does not debate whether or not to not do something, because not agreeing to not do something does not imply that something will be done.

    Everyone seems obsessed about knowing WHY we're doing this. I can't recall a time when federal politicians were likely to give their true motivations for anything, much less the federal government.

    So for those of us that agree, let's just accept that we're not going to get a straight answer, and be grateful that the right decision was made.

    For those of you that disagree, keep trying to goad the government into saying what it really thinks, so that you can charge them with being anti-american.

    By Blogger Gauntlet, at 10:39 AM  

  • SS; I agree that there's nothing wrong with changing one's opinion. However, it would be nice to have some reasoning behind the change. Obviously there must have been something which caused Martin's change of opinion.

    As for the Cellucci stuff, yeah, he's a dolt. However, Pettigrew and Martin seemed to contradict each other yesterday regarding the US shooting down missiles over Canada. It's still unclear as to whether or not we'd get a say in this.

    By Blogger calgarygrit, at 12:33 PM  

  • Hey Cal Grit, Paul sure became a Canadian Nationalist in a hurry! Check out these comments today:

    "But in terms of Canadian airspace, yes we would expect to be consulted. This is our airspace. We're a sovereign nation. And you don't intrude on a sovereign nation's airspace without seeking permission," Martin said.

    Martin also rejected claims by U.S. ambassador to Canada Paul Cellucci that Canada has given up its sovereignty by saying no to the missile plan

    "We did not give up sovereignty," Martin responded. "We affirmed sovereignty...I think the other important thing is the other affirmation of sovereignty is the very large defence budget, which is designed to protect our coast, borders and Arctic sovereignty and also make sure we can play a role in the world. That is also an affirmation of our sovereignty," he said.

    http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/02/25/martin-missile.html

    I realize Paul may be pulling out the nationalist Captain Canada card here to curry favour among those Canadians who helped convince him to back down.. but I at least like his public stance.. and espescially for directly answering Celluci.

    By Blogger Scott Tribe, at 12:55 PM  

  • CG,

    Agreed, an explanation would have been nice. However, it seems that the safe bet is that almost everyone outside of Alberta doesn't particularly like the idea of a BMD system. As such Martin would be alienating a lot of Canadians if he agreed to involve Canada in Star Wars.

    Another likely reason is that Martin'll probably need the NDP and the Bloc to counter the CPC sometime in the near future. Given that both the BQ and the NDP are quite vocal about their opposition to BMD, saying no to Star Wars probably wins Martin at least one favor from Duceppe and Layton.

    Those are just my guesses though.

    By Blogger Socialist Swine, at 1:23 PM  

  • Martin will need the BQ/NDP against the CPC? Martin has more seats than the CPC; his main fear has to be any collusion between the BQ/CPC which could defeat him. i.e. stuff to do with the fiscal imbalance or healthcare, which touch Quebec.

    And the sovereignty discourse is moot: I have a hunch that international law would protect the US should they decide to shoot down a missile in Canadian airspace, and moreover that noone would care even if it didn't (unless, of course, they tok out Edmonton by mistake or something - but that's different than an airspace violation).

    Not to mention that Martin has a knack for making Cellucci sound like he wears the pants in the current prime minister - outgoing ambassador relationship.

    By Blogger matt, at 1:51 PM  

  • Matt,

    That's what I meant, if Martin doesn't keep the NDP and the BQ happy, they can go over with the CPC to force the dissolution of Parliament.

    By Blogger Socialist Swine, at 6:19 PM  

  • Though, I grant it is unlikely that the NDP will get too friendly with the CPC. That said, the BQ and the CPC can force no confidence if the NDP and LPC don't have all their MPs in on a vote.

    By Blogger Socialist Swine, at 6:22 PM  

  • #20. The book In An Uncertain World would tend to have one thinking that the US did quite abit more than Martin ever did.

    Robert E. Rubin seems to make mention of a $20 billion loan from the US to Mexico to help lead them through the crisis.

    RT

    By Blogger Bemused, at 7:53 PM  

  • Alot of interesting comments on this blog, I was searching for some doctor related info and some how cam across this site. I found it pretty cool, so I bookmarked. I'll really liked the second post on the front page, that got my attention.

    My site is in a bit different area, but just as useful. I have a mens male enhancement reviews related site focusing on mens male enhancement reviews and mens health related topics.

    By Blogger 7472, at 6:56 AM  

  • Just thought i would say hi from Japan. Doing some blog surfing and found your site. Im looking for some cool styles of home equity loan online for my own blog. Theres some really amazing blogs about. if you have time check out my site you will find information on home equity loan online. Well when i get my blog running hope you come and check it out.

    By Blogger heropoo, at 5:53 PM  

  • Nice blog, keep up the good work!
    I have a blog/site toomobile home equity loan
    It's a free information site on on home equity loans and refinancing. It can help you save money if you are in the market for a loan.
    You should check it out if you have the time :-)

    By Blogger Online Incomes, at 9:00 PM  

  • Your blog is great, I always enjoy new ways to gather information. Keep up the great work. No better time than now to learn about Low interest rate mortgage New Information revealed! http:\\thehomemortgageguide.com

    By Blogger Credit Score Improvement, at 4:29 AM  

  • Cool blog. I have free time now to blog thanks to http:\\thehomemortgageguide.com. They helped me get an amazing home mortgage refinance with a low interest rate so I could pay off a lot of high payment credit card debt and various bills that were killing me every month. I thought I couldn't qualify for a real estate loan because of my bad credit, but they proved me wrong and with no pressure to work with them! Mortgage after bankruptcy is awesome and I would recommend them to anyone who has or wants a mortgage.

    By Blogger Credit Score Improvement, at 1:09 PM  

  • Great Blog! I love to see informative sites and active discussion. I have bookmarked this site so I can check in from time to time. If you have a chance check out this site http:\\thehomemortgageguide.com which has alot of valuable info on Investment property refinance Thanks again for the Blog

    By Blogger Debt Consolidation Refinance, at 7:23 PM  

  • This is a excellent blog. Keep it going. This may be of interest to you information about http:\\www.customortgage.net Poor credit home loan STOP renting now, Find out how! Poor credit home loan

    By Blogger Debt Consolidation Refinance, at 3:57 AM  

  • Your blog I found to be very interesting!
    I just came across your blog and wanted to
    drop you a note telling you how impressed I was with
    the information you have posted here.
    I have a bad credit mortgage loan lenders
    site.
    Come and check it out if you get time :-)
    Best regards!

    By Blogger Joe Berenguer, at 8:22 AM  

  • Interesting blog with a lot of comments. I only have one useful thing to add to this blog. If any of you guys own a home in California and are considering a home mortgage refinance whether you have good or bad credit, check out http:\\www.customortgage.net. I found this site while I was on Home Mortgage Guide and I discovered a lot of good, free advise. Before you make a decision about any mortgage loan, you should be informed to exactly what your options are. I found a way better, and much lower interest rate thanks to http:\\www.customortgage.net. In the past I always thought banks were my only option when looking for a home mortgage refinance, but I was really wrong. I saved a lot of money and a lot of hassle, and if you want to do the same, go to http:\\www.customortgage.net.

    By Blogger Debt Consolidation Refinance, at 4:31 PM  

  • This is an excellent blog. Keep it going.You are providing
    a great resource on the Internet here!
    If you have a moment, please take a look at my bad credit mortgage rate site.
    Have a great week!

    By Blogger Joe Berenguer, at 5:11 PM  

  • Hey, you have a great blog here! I'm definitely going to bookmark you!
    I have a online bankruptcy site.
    Come and check it out if you get time :-)
    Greetings.

    By Blogger Jane Carpenter, at 12:09 PM  

  • A very interesting read. Will make it a point to visit more often.

    Cheers,
    Suileman payday loan

    By Blogger SEO, at 8:50 PM  

  • Nice. But hardly a scandal is it. citibank loan student

    By Blogger SEO, at 11:04 AM  

  • If you have difficulty in obtaining a standard unsecured credit card - try for blue sky credit card approval here and can use the various internet account related services.

    By Blogger Lachlanjack, at 9:32 AM  

  • By Blogger Debt Help, at 5:06 PM  

  • By Blogger Debt Help, at 7:14 AM  

  • By Blogger Debt Help, at 9:27 PM  

  • Hey.... you can review and apply online for credit card here. It is free!

    By Blogger Jamesmatthew, at 7:01 AM  

  • What are your 50,000 thoughts a day creating?

    Our thoughts create our reality. This is a simple truth known by all people involved on the spiritual path. It is one of the most taught universal principles in the personal development field. Yet it is one of the most misunderstood!

    People practice visualisation, affirmations, they use hypnosis, subliminal programming or countless other tools to transform their lives. However they fail to recognise one key area in their lives that hinder these wonderful techniques from being effective.

    They sit day after day visualising their perfect scene and yet nothing happens. Why? They have followed all the instructions to the letter! They have chanted and imagined! They have formed a colourful, vibrant scene in their minds and affirmed that this is their reality. Then all of a sudden things get worse! What is going on?

    Would you like to know the secret? Would you like to know why these people get no results? Would you like to hear one powerful statement that explains everything?

    Yes?
    Good. I will tell you why these people get no results or even opposite results to those they are aiming for -simply because of the following truth. Consciously controlled thoughts such as visualisations do not materialise - ALL thoughts materialise!!!
    Most people believe that if they visualise for 10 minutes a day their lives will magically transform. This is not the case. You must change your core thinking. You think approx. 50,000 thoughts a day. How many of those thoughts are working against your ten minute visualisation?
    You can control the thoughts that enter your mind by changing the way you view the world. You can decide which thoughts you give energy to and which thoughts you discard.

    The thoughts that you follow and give energy to become more dominant than the thoughts you discard. Your subconscious mind records these as your dominant picture on the issue at hand. You then move towards this picture because your subconscious mind starts making your outside world reflect the picture that you have stored internally.
    Your mind should be on whatever you want. The picture you need to have is a positive vision of you already having achieved your goal. To realise this vision you need to focus and concentrate. Remember thoughts are real, they create your reality.
    Let's say you have been visualising a new house. You spend your ten minutes in meditation picturing yourself living in your dream home. You finish your session and get up feeling positive that you will achieve your goal. Then during the day you get a heating bill through the post and exclaim "Oh no look how expensive this is I cannot afford to heat this house". Where is your focus in the present moment? What are you affirming? You are telling your subconscious mind that you cannot deal with what you have. You are affirming that your life is not how you want it to be. If you knew without doubt that within a week you would be moving to your new home would you honestly be worried about a heating bill? Perhaps other doubts creep in like "I should be happy with what I have", or "I will never get this house looking the way I want it" and so on and so on.
    These thoughts that are not aligned with your goal. You are not giving complete attention to what you want. Whilst you are dealing with these other lines of thought your attention is not on your goal.
    If you are aware of your thoughts you will suddenly realise that you have spent much more energy on counter productive thoughts than on creating a dominant picture of the goal you want.
    Point your focus in the direction of you're the life you want. Think about what you want NOT what you don't want. It's that simple.

    Your focus determines your reality. Change your focus and you change your life. subliminal

    By Blogger vkk1_hypno, at 10:29 AM  

  • Man i didnt expect to find this but once i read on a bit i figured you need to visit generic viagra and see the real deal.

    By Blogger jenney, at 1:21 PM  

  • By Blogger Debt Help, at 2:39 AM  

  • Hi Fellow! I was just searching blogs,and I found yours! I like it!
    If you have a moment, please visit my debt help Delaware site.
    Good luck!

    By Blogger Bill Harrison, at 1:50 AM  

  • Hi Blogger,
    I was on the web looking for more information on College Debt Consolidation and found your site. Great site, keep it up. We provide good free information on College Debt Consolidation, should you ever need such info, please drop by

    By Blogger Top Useful Tips, at 2:51 PM  

  • I must say that I have found The American Express Centurion card to be one of the most useful and most rewarding card to use.

    By Blogger Jamesmatthew, at 8:17 AM  

  • Hey, I recently added a news widget from www.widgetmate.com to my blog. It shows the latest news, and just took a copy and paste to implement. Might interest you too.

    By Blogger Addison, at 4:46 PM  

  • I fully tie in with everything you have printed.

    By Anonymous www.segovia-3d.com, at 3:07 AM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home