Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Regifting

The Liberal Party's Million Conversations campaign to raise a million dollars has featured almost daily e-mails from current Liberal MPs, past Liberal greats, and Paul Martin. These letters have taken on an increasingly frantic tone, culminating in Jean Chretien's warning yesterday that Harper may re-open the abortion and Same Sex Marriage issues.

Obviously that's not going to happen, but it's not any more far fetched than Conservative Party fundraising e-mails ("The CBC will take away your gun"), so if it raises a few dollars, well, that's the way the game is played.

That said, I do wonder about today's letter from Alf Apps, which I've reposted here:

Dan --

We warned you about what Stephen Harper would do with a majority government, and we've finally seen the results.

I didn't believe it myself until I saw the
news stories today about Stephen Harper's latest act of deception. As shocking as it sounds, he has used an old photo in this year's Christmas Card, passing it off as something new.

I know Harper apologists at Sun TV will defend this move, but it is indefensible. I used to think only Liberals could display this type of laziness, but I now see that Harper can be just as lazy - no, dare I say, more lazy than Liberal elites.

Beyond the laziness is a more troubling issue. One of deception. One of lies.

I ask you this - why hasn't Stephen Harper shared a new picture on this year's card? What is he hiding? What doesn't he want you to know? This card is the clearest sign yet that he plans to ban abortion in Canada. Yes, you heard that right. Baning abortion. In Canada. He must be stopped.

When I first heard about this Million Conversations Campaign, I thought: "great, now we're finally getting serious about what it will take to fight the Conservatives".

I understand that we have already fundraised enough to start 925,885 conversations in 2012. That's good.

But our goal is a million and that means, with less than 5 hours left, you must decide if your values are worth fighting for. It's now or never.

Please donate $5 right now - that's just $1.25 after the tax credit - and we can reach a million.

You can also call 1-800-701-7789 (9am - 5pm, ET, Mon-Fri) to donate by phone.

Thank you.

Alfred Apps


13 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:03 p.m.

    k, this is a joke, right?

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Now or never"

    What does that mean? Does something happen in a couple of weeks?

    Is there a law that says whoever is in power at the end of 2011 becomes prime minister for life unless some other party has started a million conversations?

    If so, that's a dumb law.

    Must have been Stephane Dion.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:52 p.m.

    You've become part of what's wrong with this country, CalgaryGrit. With nothing constructive to add to the debate, do you just keep this blog running for shameful self-promotion?

    ReplyDelete
  4. And why do you hate the troops, CalgaryGrit?

    And kittens? What did kittens ever do to you?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous3:47 a.m.

    Personally, I'd be curious to know who's pulling the curtains behind the scenes.

    Or am I supposed to be so naive as to think Chretien penned this missive himself, without any prompting from anyone else in the Party?

    No, I guess Liberals really don't want to know facts.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous3:48 a.m.

    Err, sorry, Alf.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why does Stephen Harper hate Christmas?

    ReplyDelete
  8. The great irony is that when Chretien was PM he opposed same sex marriage every step of the way and did everything he could stall its passage. His views on abortion rights were also very lukewarm.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It's apparent to me that this latest scam is just a result of Harper's own 'Clarence', who's making him relive the same Christmas over and over again until he finishes that hockey book. Apparently his cold, heartless approach to governing interferes with his confabbing with his ghost writer...

    ReplyDelete
  10. The great irony is that when Chretien was PM he opposed same sex marriage every step of the way and did everything he could stall its passage. His views on abortion rights were also very lukewarm.

    What are you talking about?

    If Chretien opposed same-sex marriage ever step of the way, he would have appealed the provincial court decisions in 2003. (See legalization of prostitution and the current government battles on the decision.) Chretien didn't, which got him a scolding from the Catholic Bishops.

    Here's a quote on him with regards to same-sex marriage:
    "Believe me, for someone of my generation, born and brought up in Catholic rural Quebec of my youth, this is a very difficult issue. But I have learned over forty years in public service that society evolves, and that the concept of human rights evolves more quickly than some of us -- and sometimes in ways that makes some feel uncomfortable. But at the end of the day, we have to live up to our responsibilities."

    Old-fashioned... but hardly arguing to roll back the clock on the situation.

    As for abortion rights... he was luke-warm on them? That's why he fought with the Liberals for Life faction. I doubt someone luke-warm about abortion rights would declare: “I am a Catholic and for abortion.”

    ReplyDelete
  11. Chretien and Martin voted to define marriage as bieng between a man and a woman in 2000. Enough said.

    ReplyDelete